Reading Settings
Font Size
16px
Line Spacing
1.6
Reading Width
900px
Font Share
Theme
Text To Speech

162: Chapter 162 Draft on Artificial Intelligence

Days passed with a deceptive calm, yet undercurrents surged fiercely. Chen Youhua buried himself in nuclear fusion data at HF, while in the laboratory, Wang Zhe and Li Wei pushed forward with neural interface experiments, all against a backdrop of overt and covert technological competition across the globe.

However, the international court of public opinion was suddenly roiled by a monumental move from Rabbit Country.

Major news channels worldwide were broadcasting an urgent bulletin.

"The delegation of Rabbit Country has formally submitted a proposal draft titled 'On Strengthening International Cooperation for the Safety, Reliability, and Controllability of Artificial Intelligence Systems' at the United Nations General Assembly. It calls upon the international community to establish a global framework concerning the upper limits, transparency, and oversight mechanisms for Artificial Intelligence research and development!"

The news release prominently featured a quote from the Representative of Rabbit Country.

"As Artificial Intelligence technology advances at a breathtaking pace, it brings immense opportunities while simultaneously harboring undeniable systemic risks.

Particularly concerning are certain research directions dedicated to breaking through existing architectures and pursuing unconstrained autonomy and super-intelligence. Their long-term consequences are unpredictable and may even endanger the very subjectivity and existential security of human civilization.

This proposal aims to prepare for potential challenges. By establishing international consensus and restraint mechanisms, we seek to ensure that the development of Artificial Intelligence remains on a track that is safe, reliable, and controllable, benefiting all humanity rather than becoming an untamable intelligent AI.

Suggestions include, but are not limited to: setting evaluable safety thresholds for the intelligence level of core foundational models; establishing internationally recognized mechanisms for reporting AI R&D progress and cross-monitoring; and imposing restrictions on foundational algorithm research that may lead to strong autonomous consciousness or behaviors that are difficult to explain and control..."

This news instantly rocketed into the top ten of global internet trending charts, triggering a tsunami of discussion.

@GlobalCurrentAffairsHotTake: "Blockbuster! Rabbit Country drops an AI restriction proposal at the UN. Is this putting the brakes on global AI development?"

Tens of thousands of comments flooded in instantly below:

"Support! It really is time for some restrictions! Nowadays, any company dares to claim they're working on AI—writing code haphazardly, feeding data blindly, ignoring ethics and safety, just riding the hype to make money! If we don't get a handle on this, the day we truly create a Skynet or an AI that betrays humanity, it'll be too late for tears!"

"The person above is worrying too much! Watched too many movies? Every single AI on the market right now is just advanced pattern recognition plus big data fitting, isn't it?

It's miles away from true intelligence! Rabbit Country is clearly lagging behind in technology, afraid of falling too far behind, so they're proposing everyone just stop running!"

"You're the one with short-sightedness! Does danger only exist when there's an AI capable of destroying the world?

Current AI is already misusing privacy, creating discrimination, engaging in algorithmic price discrimination, and deepfaking to mislead public opinion!

Regardless of Rabbit Country's original intentions, this proposal at least raises the issue! Must we wait until it's irreparable?"

"Why can't it be that Rabbit Country's AI has become so advanced that they genuinely find the technology too dangerous, hence proactively proposing restrictions? Just like with nuclear weapons, it's the countries that possess them first who truly worry about proliferation."

"Hahahaha, dying of laughter. Rabbit Country is decent in the AI field, but still far from leading the world, right? What a boast... Clearly strategic deception to slow others down!"

"Strategic deception? Look at who recently proved the Navier-Stokes Equation? Look at the Qiming Smart Manufacturing Engine... although there's not much news, it doesn't seem simple. Don't judge with old perceptions."

"Don't worry, Eagle Country will definitely be the first to oppose! Even if the proposal passes, research will continue privately anyway. Aren't treaties made to be torn up?"

"What does this have to do with my monthly salary of three thousand? No matter how powerful AI gets, can it help me pay my mortgage or give me a partner?"

"There it is! The classic 'monthly salary warrior'! But honestly, if AI really goes out of control, whether you earn three thousand or thirty thousand a month, we're all finished together..."

The online debate raged fiercely, with voices of support, opposition, mockery, and concern intertwining, creating a lively uproar.

Meanwhile, at the United Nations headquarters building in NY, the formal review process for this proposal was proceeding step-by-step in an atmosphere of subtle tension.

The vast conference hall was filled to capacity with representatives from various countries.

The delegation of Rabbit Country sat at their assigned seats. The chief representative appeared calm and composed, flipping through documents in hand, occasionally exchanging a word or two in a low voice with the deputy beside him, as if the global public opinion storm swirling outside had nothing to do with this place.

The assembly proceedings moved slowly and solemnly.

After discussions on several other agenda items concerning climate change, regional conflicts, and public health, the chairman finally struck the gavel and announced,

"The next agenda item: Review of the draft proposal 'On Strengthening International Cooperation for the Safety, Reliability, and Controllability of Artificial Intelligence Systems' submitted by the Representative of Rabbit Country."

Instantly, the gaze of the entire hall focused on the delegation of Rabbit Country.

The chief Representative of Rabbit Country straightened his suit and stood up unhurriedly, walking towards the speaker's podium.

He adjusted the microphone, his gaze steady as it swept across the assembly hall, and began his formal address in a clear, even tone.

"Mr. Chairman, Distinguished Representatives,

"Our delegation submits this draft for the Assembly's consideration not out of any single nation's self-interest, but based on a profound concern for the shared future of all humanity and a responsible attitude.

"Artificial Intelligence technology is reshaping our world at an unprecedented pace, and the benefits it brings are evident.

However, as history has repeatedly shown, any powerful, disruptive technology, if lacking necessary guidance and restraint, can become a runaway horse deviating from its intended course.

"Currently, Artificial Intelligence research and development lacks global safety standards and ethical baselines.

Some research directions are enthusiastic about enhancing the autonomy and complexity of models, yet pay insufficient attention to their explainability, controllability, and long-term impact assessment.

This tendency to ask only whether a technology can be achieved, without questioning whether humanity can control it, is extremely dangerous."

"We do not seek to stifle innovation. On the contrary, we aim to safeguard truly beneficial innovation for humanity by establishing a clear safety framework.

Otherwise, disorderly competition could lead to a prisoner's dilemma, forcing all participants toward dangerous extremes."

"Therefore, the core recommendations of this proposal include the following points:"

"First, to establish an international panel for Artificial Intelligence safety risk assessment, supported by the International Science Council. This panel would be responsible for defining the potential risks of different levels of AI systems and proposing corresponding safety R&D guidelines and reference thresholds for intelligence levels."

"Simultaneously, we advocate for major AI R&D nations to voluntarily establish a notification mechanism for key AI R&D projects, enhancing transparency, and engaging in international consultations on research directions that may pose significant risks."

"We call upon all nations to legislate restrictions or prohibitions on certain known foundational algorithmic pathways that may directly lead to AI systems developing uncontrollable self-awareness or extreme behaviors to circumvent human intervention. This is not restricting thought, but rather putting a cage on technology."

"We emphasize the obligation of developed nations to assist developing countries in the field of AI technology, bridging the digital divide, preventing new technological hegemony and inequality, and ensuring the shared benefits of AI."

"Distinguished Representatives, the march of technology will not halt, but our wisdom and responsibility must precede it.

Today, we stand at a historical crossroads. Do we choose to work together to build a safe, inclusive digital future, or do we let things drift until we face a potentially irreparable situation?

Rabbit Country's choice is clear and firm. We call upon all parties, in a constructive spirit, to jointly discuss and refine this proposal, fastening a digital safety belt for humanity's future."

"Thank you, Mr. Chairman."

After the speech by the Representative of Rabbit Country concluded, a brief silence fell over the assembly hall, followed by polite applause. However, the expressions of many representatives had become exceptionally serious and complex.

Next would be the moment for representatives from various countries to take turns stating their positions. It was foreseeable that a fierce diplomatic contest and clash of viewpoints was about to begin.

In the seating area of the Eagle Country delegation, several diplomats were engaged in rapid, hushed conversation, their expressions grave.

The representative of John Bull Country adjusted his glasses, jotting down notes quickly on paper.

The representative of Gaul Rooster Country wore a thoughtful expression, fingers tapping lightly on the table...

Prev Next

🔊 Text To Speech

Listen while reading

Ready