164: Chapter 164 Public Opinion Gradually Rises

The day after the United Nations conference concluded, the headquarters building in Eagle Country's Silicon Valley was brightly lit.

In a spacious and bright conference room, several executives in suits sat around an oval conference table.

Thick folders and multiple laptops were on the table. The screens displayed news from the recently concluded United Nations conference and detailed analysis reports of Rabbit Country's proposal.

“This is a perfect opportunity.”

Jackson, the CEO seated at the head of the table, tapped the screen showing the Representative of Rabbit Country's speech with his finger, his tone steady and sharp.

“They personally handed the topic's popularity to us.

Now the whole world is discussing the risks and limitations of Artificial Intelligence, which is precisely the entry point we need for our story: not limitation, but breakthrough; not fear, but the future.”

Sarah, the Marketing Director beside him, immediately chimed in, opening a detailed media placement plan in a PowerPoint presentation.

“Exactly, our core narrative is very clear: Rabbit Country's proposal stems from their anxiety about their own technological backwardness and their fear of the future.

What we represent is the power that bravely pioneers and leads humanity forward. We need to completely shift this discussion from whether Artificial Intelligence should be restricted to who can lead the future of Artificial Intelligence.”

She flipped to the next page, which listed the upcoming product matrix and key information points.

“GPT-5's performance parameters are ready. Every indicator targets areas where Rabbit Country might be seen as leading in current public opinion, or areas of concern in their proposal. We need to conduct precise, comparative releases.”

Tom, the Technical Director, pushed up his glasses and added.

“Especially as per your instructions, we have focused on strengthening its capabilities in solving complex mathematical problems, scientific reasoning, and code generation.

The improvements in these areas for the new model are phenomenal, especially in mathematics. The increase in accuracy and problem-solving speed is enough to make any so-called theoretical breakthrough seem pale.

This is the most powerful response: demonstrating the gap with absolute strength at the application level.”

“Excellent.” Jackson nodded with satisfaction.

“Let's start by attacking with mathematics and scientific reasoning. Their Navier-Stokes Equation is remarkable?

Then let the world see at what speed theoretical derivations, which take years and rely on flashes of genius, can be solved and applied in front of our Artificial Intelligence.

This is not just a technological display; it's a psychological crushing.”

Almost simultaneously, across the ocean in London, at the DeepMind headquarters, a strategic positioning meeting was also underway.

“The breakthrough points of the new version of Gemini Ultra happen to align with the current public opinion focus.”

Demis, the Chief Scientist, displayed the test report.

“We have made industry-defining progress in scientific reasoning, complex system simulation, and creative problem-solving.

Rabbit Country's proposal has conveniently paved the way for us. They worry that Artificial Intelligence is uncontrollable, and we will show how Artificial Intelligence is used to solve humanity's most intractable scientific problems.”

Emily, the Product Director, had a hint of sarcasm at the corner of her mouth.

“Their proposal is essentially an embodiment of technological anxiety.

When you can't compete in the same race, the most direct way is to try to change the rules of the game, to make others slow down too.

And our responsibility is to tell the world with irrefutable facts how far ahead we are on this path.”

“Then, let's begin.”

Demis closed the report.

“Arrange the global media press conference immediately.

The tone will be optimistic, powerful, and committed to solving humanity's ultimate problems.

In contrast, their restriction proposal will sound so conservative and outdated.”

A highly coordinated, well-funded propaganda offensive, aimed at completely dominating the global Artificial Intelligence narrative, quickly swept across mainstream global media and social platforms.

On CNN's evening news, the anchor reported with an astonished tone.

“Just one day after the United Nations debated Artificial Intelligence restrictions, OpenAI delivered its answer: the stunningly released GPT-5 model, with its exceptional capabilities in complex mathematics and scientific applications, has redefined the boundaries of Artificial Intelligence.”

On screen, GPT-5 was shown in real-time parsing and solving a highly complex partial differential equation, its speed and accuracy emphasized as surpassing human expert teams.

BBC's technology segment focused on DeepMind's ultimate mission.

“While some are discussing how to restrict Artificial Intelligence, others are using Artificial Intelligence to conquer cancer.

The latest iteration of AlphaFold can not only predict protein structures but has also entered the stage of actively designing entirely new protein drugs.”

The report quoted a laboratory expert.

“This will shorten new drug development cycles from years to weeks.”

Gallic Rooster Country's Le Figaro commented from its preferred cultural perspective.

“In Silicon Valley, Artificial Intelligence is a sharp tool for exploring scientific frontiers, while in some places, it is still an object of cautious prevention.

The ideological gap here may be more profound than the technological gap.”

This was supplemented by examples of AI-generated artworks being highly sought after in the auction market.

Hans Country's Der Spiegel, as always rigorous, reported with detailed data comparisons.

“At the implementation level of Industry 4.0, the efficiency gains brought by advanced Artificial Intelligence-based optimization systems are overwhelming.

Skeptics should perhaps consider whether to embrace this wave or be left behind by it.”

In the realm of social media, information dissemination was even more precise and emotional.

Tech influencers, academic stars, and financial bloggers all joined in, their core messages highly unified, praising the disruptive nature of the latest Artificial Intelligence achievements.

At the same time, subtly or overtly, they contrasted this with Rabbit Country's proposal, creating a binary opposition between innovation and conservatism, openness and closure, future and past.

On T, the highly influential tech blogger @TechGuru posted a tweet.

“GPT-5's capabilities in mathematics and science make some theoretical breakthroughs seem like stories from another era. This is the future!”

The comments section was quickly flooded with discussions of “shock,” “job anxiety,” and “technological divide.”

On YT, the titles of videos from top tech channels were even more impactful.

“GPT-5: It Solved My PhD Thesis Problem. Do We Still Need to Fear Artificial Intelligence?”

The video content strongly highlighted the power and practicality of Artificial Intelligence, and at the end, posed a question.

“When such a tool is within reach, should the focus of discussion be how to use it well, or how to lock it away?”

The core strategy of this propaganda storm was very clear.

Fully leveraging the global attention brought by Rabbit Country's proposal, through intensive, overwhelming displays of technological achievements.

To portray themselves as an optimistic, powerful, and bright force representing the future, while subtly labeling the proposing party as conservative, anxious, and hindering progress, thereby achieving a brilliant reversal and suppression in the arena of public opinion.